Cu ce a\u021bi prefera s\u0103 v\u0103 lupta\u021bi, cu o ra\u021b\u0103 de m\u0103rimea unui cal sau cu cincizeci de cai de m\u0103rimea unei ra\u021be? Dac\u0103 nu v\u0103 surprinde \u00eentrebarea, sunt \u0219anse s\u0103 v\u0103 afla\u021bi \u00eentr-una din urm\u0103toarele categorii: a) urm\u0103ri\u021bi sesiunile de AMA (ask me anything) de pe Reddit, b) a\u021bi f\u0103cut parte la un moment dat dintr-un club de argumentare \u0219i dezbateri, sau c) a\u021bi fost la unul dintre cursurile noastre.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dac\u0103 v\u0103 surprinde \u00eentrebarea \u0219i sunte\u021bi tenta\u021bi s\u0103 r\u0103spunde\u021bi, lua\u021bi-v\u0103 c\u00e2teva momente \u0219i alege\u021bi-v\u0103 adversarul \u2013 ra\u021ba sau caii? Apoi, face\u021bi un pas metaforic \u00een spate \u0219i urm\u0103ri\u021bi ce s-a \u00eent\u00e2mplat \u00een mintea voastr\u0103. A\u021bi dat un prim r\u0103spuns instinctiv, \u0219i dac\u0103 da, a venit din senin sau e ancorat \u00eentr-o experien\u021b\u0103 personal\u0103, eventual afectiv\u0103? Cu alte cuvinte a\u021bi surpins la locul faptei Sistemul 1, cel descris de Daniel Kahneman \u00een celebra sa carte, G\u00e2ndire rapid\u0103, g\u00e2ndire lent\u0103, ca fiind sistemul decizional intuitiv \u0219i non-ra\u021bional? Sau dimpotriv\u0103, a\u021bi luat-o ca pe o problem\u0103 de logic\u0103, \u00eencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 vizualiza\u021bi situa\u021bia \u0219i aproxim\u00e2nd-o cu o experien\u021b\u0103 familiar\u0103, de exemplu analogia cu un proiect solicitant \u0219i important versus mai multe sarcini m\u0103runte, dar cople\u0219itoare prin num\u0103rul lor?
O dat\u0103 ce a\u021bi ales o pozi\u021bie, ce argumente ave\u021bi pentru a o sus\u021bine? Aceea\u0219i invita\u021bie la reflec\u021bie de mai sus. Ce fel de argumente a\u021bi g\u0103sit? C\u00e2t de solide sunt? C\u00e2t de distincte? Dac\u0103 a\u021bi acceptat conven\u021bia jocului, ele se bazeaz\u0103 pe aspecte diverse ale situa\u021biei? De exemplu, caracteristicile animalului, starea terenului, condi\u021biile de lupt\u0103? Sau sunt mai degrab\u0103 unul \u0219i acela\u0219i argument, \u00eembr\u0103cat \u00een forme u\u0219or diferite?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Exemplul acesta, aparent absurd, este un exerci\u021biu foarte bun prin care putem s\u0103 facem ceva ce nu este u\u0219or deloc \u2013 s\u0103 ne g\u00e2ndim la cum ne g\u00e2ndim. De ce ne-am obosi? Este important s\u0103 \u00een\u021belegem cum func\u021bioneaz\u0103 angrenajul acesta intuitiv-ra\u021bional, s\u0103 \u00eel surprindem in vivo, pentru a \u00een\u021belege \u00een ce fel ajungem s\u0103 lu\u0103m anumite decizii \u0219i ce deriv\u0103 din asta. Este, de asemenea, important s\u0103 \u00een\u021belegem cum ne construim argumentele, pe ce ne baz\u0103m, explicit sau implict, dac\u0103 sunt suficiente \u0219i care ar fi contraargumentele. Deseori avem deja un parti pris, ne-am \u00eendr\u0103gostit, cum ar veni, de o idee sau de o solu\u021bie \u0219i automat c\u00e2mpul nostru vizual se \u00eengusteaz\u0103. Ne pierdem din suple\u021bea g\u00e2ndirii, concentra\u021bi fiind pe a demonstra c\u0103 avem dreptate \u0219i pozi\u021bia noastr\u0103 e cea corect\u0103. \u0218i ne trezim prin\u0219i \u00een dezbateri sterile din care nimeni nu are de c\u00e2\u0219tigat, dec\u00e2t poate amorul propriu. A\u0219adar poate nu ar strica s\u0103 facem, \u00een momentele c\u00e2nd suntem \u00een modul idle \u0219i avem acest r\u0103gaz, mici exerci\u021bii ca cel cu ra\u021ba \u0219i caii. Exerci\u021bii f\u0103r\u0103 o miz\u0103 real\u0103, dar care ne antreneaz\u0103 \u00een a folosi mai con\u0219tient \u0219i mai bine duetul intui\u021bie \u2013 logic\u0103 \u00een deciziile care chiar conteaz\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Weekly Inspiration scris de Alina Doica.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Cu ce a\u021bi prefera s\u0103 v\u0103 lupta\u021bi, cu o ra\u021b\u0103 de m\u0103rimea unui cal sau cu cincizeci de cai de m\u0103rimea unei ra\u021be? Dac\u0103 nu v\u0103 surprinde \u00eentrebarea, sunt \u0219anse s\u0103 v\u0103…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9570,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9652"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9652"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9652\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9653,"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9652\/revisions\/9653"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/9570"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/i-interact.eu\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}